16th February 2017 -



Last week the Sark Newspaper reported on the statement below, issued by the States of Guernsey. In essence, the democratically elected government of Guernsey is announcing two things: •   The Bailiwick of Guernsey, including Brecqhou and Jethou, is complying with international tax compliance legislation.

•   The Island of Sark, although a part of the Bailiwick of Guernsey, is not. It is, for undisclosed reasons, uniquely exempt.

What makes this Island so unique that, unequalled in the western world, it is exempt from international tax compliance legislation? The feeble excuse given by Sark’s unelected ‘government’ for this exemption is that the data required is not collected because the local administration to do so is non-existent. This is a lie. Even the smaller Islands of Brecqhou and Jethou are considered compliant. Sark refuses to cooperate with the outside world, be it with Guernsey or with the international community at large, in the on-going war on tax evasion and other financial fraud and no one outside of Sark has the power to do anything about it. Not the elected government of Guernsey. Not the UK Ministry of Justice and not the British Crown. They are prepared instead to permit feudal lord Christopher Beaumont’s one-party state to remain exempt from international tax compliance legislation regardless of the serious reputational damage that this is inflicting on Guernsey’s ever fragile financial services sector.

Nothing in Sark can be taken on face value. It has taken four pages of this edition to publish, in the public interest, the known directorships, past and current, of a local electrician and employee of Sark Electricity Ltd, Simon Boyd De Carteret, the one ruling party state’s tax assessor. In addition to his day-job and his side-line as provider of unregulated “offshore financial services” De Carteret is also paid by Sark’s unelected ‘government’ to collect the taxes they extort from the Island’s people, despite the fact that not one member of this sham "government" has a mandate from the electorate to make laws, enforce laws, or to raise taxes.  Paying the one ruling party’s tax demands is akin to paying protection money to a criminal mob.

A study of people’s lifestyles, in particular the members and supporters of the one ruling party state, reveal all sorts of anomalies when comparing their visible lifestyles and wealth to the income achievable from their apparent livelihoods. This is because Sark, as vividly illustrated on pages 8 - 11 of this publication, remains a centre for highly lucrative unregulated “offshore financial services” of the kind that international tax compliance legislation is seeking to eradicate. It is a small wonder that Guernsey is desperate to protect its all-important reputation as a law-abiding and well-regulated jurisdiction with which it is safe to do business by publicly washing its hands of Sark.

With no border control, no professional policing, no company law or register and no collection of data, not even of who is resident here, the British Crown Dependency of Sark is unique in the western world. Anyone can come here - including criminals just out of prison - and conduct lucrative "business" that is registered nowhere, regulated nowhere, pays tax nowhere and evades each and every piece of international tax compliance regulation in existence.


9th February 2017


Over the past eight years numerous small business on Sark, the very life blood of the Island’s visible economy, have closed their doors for good - succumbing to the state-sponsored campaign of anti-business legislation, regulations, bullying, harassment and intimidation. Enforced by 21st century brownshirts loyal to the Beaumont family’s totalitarian regime, this campaign has amounted to economic ethnic cleansing, the likes of which have not been seen in Western Europe since fascist Germany of the 1930s. It has resulted in the people of Sark suffering widespread hardship and austerity. Given the Island’s unique and privileged position in the world, its people should instead have been enjoying a decade of increasing prosperity and year on year rises in their standards of living.

The reality is that on Sark, a British Crown Dependency, the economy has collapsed and the state’s attack on the livelihoods of its own people has resulted in an unprecedented forced exodus of working men, women and children. The number of full time year-round residents has fallen dramatically, from over 650 in December 2008 to below 420 today, a drop of 35%.

Sark’s infrastructure is at breaking point. Year on year the forced exodus of young working families has resulted in less and less residents paying both direct and indirect taxes into the Island’s exchequer. This leaves little money to carry out even basic care and maintenance of a neglected and already crumbling infrastructure. What little taxpayer-funded expenditure there is on care and maintenance is kept firmly within the control of the unelected one ruling party state members and supporters, as is the resulting employment.

Edric Baker, Paul Williams, Colin Golds, Peter Byrne, Robert Cottle, Antony Dunks and Cormac Scott are just a few of the unelected members of the one ruling party state parliament who award themselves tax payer funded state employment. Along with their fellow members of the one ruling party state parliament, not one of them have faced the electorate, not one of them have received a single vote and not one of them have a mandate from the people to govern on their behalf. Like the fascist dictatorships of Europe in the 1930s, Christopher Beaumont, Sark’s autocratic leader, uses his unelected chief enforcers Janet Guy, Reginald Guille and Edric Baker to ensure that every member and supporter of his regime, all of whom are wholly unelected follow the dictator’s code of:

“All within the state, nothing outside the state, nothing against the state.”

The Island’s monopoly-operating Isle of Sark Shipping Company is broke with no contingency for replacing its ageing fleet of ships. Repeatedly it has been deferring paying back the hundreds of thousands of pounds of outstanding unsecured loans which the Sark taxpayer has lent it for as long as anyone can remember. There isn't a bank on the planet that would lend the company a penny, an appalling testimony to the mismanagement of a company operating free of competition on its passenger and freight services in and out of Sark.

Each year the Island of Sark returns a budget deficit of £2 million, a figure confirmed and validated by the late Lt. Governor of Guernsey, Air Marshal Peter Walker. Despite the reputational damage which Christopher Beaumont's lawless and unregulated state causes to Guernsey’s principal economic driver, the financial services sector, successive Guernsey governments have, for unknown and unstated reasons, seen fit to syphon off £2 million of their taxpayer’s money each year to fill the hole in Sark’s public finances to shore up the Beaumont family’s one ruling party state.

How much longer will the taxpayer of Guernsey be willing to bail out the morally and financially bankrupt Island of Sark? It is an Island run by unelected state officials who have not faced the electorate, have not received a single vote and have no mandate to govern. The fact that a majority of Sark’s unelected state officials have a documented involvement with the very same unregulated “offshore financial services” that now pose a significant threat to the survival of Guernsey’s own regulated and law-abiding financial services sector is lost on no one, least of all Guernsey’s hard pressed taxpayers.


2nd February 2017 -


These three individuals, absentee feudal lord Christopher Beaumont, his chosen deputy Janet Guy and their carefully selected senior administrator Kath Jones, form the top of the governance of the totalitarian one ruling party state of Sark, despite the fact that not one of them is elected, and not one of them has a mandate from the people of this Island to govern.

Indeed, the people of Sark haven’t seen a ballot box since 2012. They’ve only seen business closures, unemployment, hardship, depopulation and rising taxes - as well as soaring household expenditure as a result of the economy of scale pushing up prices for electricity, gas, heating oil and the weekly shopping bill.

Whilst the unelected leaders and members of the one ruling party state award themselves taxpayer-funded employment and patronage, the people over whom they hold totalitarian power go without. Illustrated by the fact that two more families, four adults and six children, will be leaving Sark by Easter, maintaining a life on this Island is becoming increasingly difficult. Unless, of course, you are a member of Christopher Beaumont’s one ruling party government. Comfortably insulated from the consequences of their own actions through inherited fortune, unregulated “offshore financial services” and / or state patronage. The unelected leaders and members of Sark’s fascist one ruling party government continue down the path of economic destruction because it suits them; they don’t need to acknowledge that this Island is in crisis because they are well provided for regardless.

With his opening speech to the one ruling party parliament on 18th January this year, absentee feudal lord Christopher Beaumont showed his true colours by lying about the background of the closing down of Sark Vineyards Ltd and openly displaying scorn and hostility towards the budding new industry that was also his Island’s largest employer.

Whether or not Beaumont took his cue from the deeply unpopular Janet Guy, his chosen deputy, is unclear but not unlikely. The best-knowing Guy, a one ruling party hard-liner, was, after all, prominent amongst the one ruling party state members demonstrating and petitioning against the vineyards (and against the free press) in the first place. Senior administrator Kath Jones has so far been careful to operate in the shadows provided by the closed doors of Sark’s government. Last week she also showed her true colours - and her one ruling party credentials - by circulating falsehoods and lies surrounding the vineyards presented as facts without bothering to check their veracity. So much for the “objectivity” and “independence” of a civil servant parachuted into Sark by the UK Ministry of Justice to introduce good governance.

Under the leadership of the unelected trio consisting of Christopher Beaumont, Janet Guy and Kath Jones, the British Crown Dependency of Sark continues to be governed by self-interest - by the one ruling party state for the one ruling party state. Whatever the consequences for everyone else.


27th January 2017



Sark's economy is in a state of collapse. Over 225 jobs have been lost and most of the unemployed have had no choice but to leave the Island for good and make a life for themselves elsewhere. Many of those remaining are suffering hardship, having difficulties paying the rent and putting food on the table. Shops and businesses, big and small, have closed down, others are on the verge of bankruptcy.

The lives of many families have been devastated and over 230 Islanders have already left and others are in the process of leaving simply because they have no other choice. The fact that the Island’s resident population has dropped from 650 in 2008 to below 420 today and is still shrinking rapidly speaks for itself.

Sark is losing its life-blood, its people.

The Island’s cash reserves are depleted, consisting mainly of worthless shares in the Isle of Sark Shipping Company, whilst swingeing tax increases are continuously imposed on a diminishing number of taxpayers. As matters stand, your Island is not sustainable - neither its tourism-dependent economy nor the population which depends on that economy for their livelihoods. Without a dramatic change - without a viable economic plan which includes the border control that will give Sark direct access to the European tourist market and without a fundamental reversal of policy to restore investor confidence - the Island has no viable economic future.

You have the power to implement that change and we appeal to you, on behalf of this Island’s people, to do so before it is too late.


For 137 weeks the late feudal lord Michael Beaumont ignored our appeals on behalf of the people of Sark. Following in his father’s ignoble footsteps, so has his heir Christopher Beaumont for 32 consecutive weeks. Michael Beaumont didn’t want to help the people over whom he held enormous unelected power. Neither, we must conclude, does Christopher Beaumont.

Beaumont claims to be concerned about the recent loss of 25 jobs with the closure of Sark Vineyards Ltd but that concern rings hollow indeed in view of the fact that he has expressed nothing but scornful hostility towards the enterprise itself. For 6 months he has owned the Crown Lease on the Island of Sark, its constitution, jurisdiction and judiciary and he has shown that, like his father before him, he is unwilling to support the introduction of border control in his jurisdiction. A simple measure that would give Sark’s tourist industry - and consequently its economy - a fighting chance. Instead, like father, like son, Christopher Beaumont is willing to preside over the continuing depopulation of his Island due to the economy being wilfully destroyed by the unelected and unmandated totalitarian regime over which he proudly presides. Sark’s current feudal lord is, like his predecessor, an uncaring man incapable of concern for the welfare of others.


19th January 2017



The introduction of the European Convention on Human Rights after World War II came about to protect the individual against the powers of the State following years of oppression under fascist dictatorships and Nazism across Europe.

Despite being a British Crown Dependency and therefore a signatory to the Convention, the Island of Sark has been allowed to be in breach of the ECHR for decades. Indeed, Sark has never complied with ECHR laws. The Island was headed by one unelected individual, feudal lord Michael Beaumont, for over 40 years and more recently by his son Christopher Beaumont, who inherited from his father, ownership of the Island’s constitution, jurisdiction and judiciary, which is a complete contradiction to the ECHR laws. The Island’s parliament is merely a sham to give the impression to the outside world of a democratic government. It is presided over by the unelected Christopher Beaumont along with the Lt. Governors of these Islands to give it legislative credibility, but the reality is that it’s a one ruling party system of government with no opposing party politicians as alternatives.

The people of Sark are deprived their right to self-determination under ECHR because no one in Sark’s parliament represents the people. Not one of its members and not one of its leaders are elected. The parliament therefore has no mandate from the people to govern. In breach of ECHR, Sark’s parliament has no mandate to pass laws, no mandate to enforce those laws through their committees, no mandate to raise taxes and no mandate to collect them.

The Island of Sark is run under the authoritarian power of feudal lord Christopher Beaumont by an unelected mob which can only be liked to the brownshirts of fascist Germany of the 1930s. This unelected mob has destroyed Sark’s economy and consequently depopulated the Island by 30% in a process which can fairly be described as economic ethnic cleansing. The Island is left with no future. Only those chosen for taxpayer-funded employment by the one ruling party state and the unelected members of the unelected ruling elite who continue to make substantial amounts of tax free money for themselves by operating thousands of unregulated offshore directorships of letterbox companies, serving no obvious commercial purpose and other unregulated “offshore financial services” which enable tax evasion, money laundering and other financial crimes, to survive in Sark.

ECHR legislation was introduced for the very purpose of ensuring that fascism would never again rise in Europe. Until such time that the Crown enforces the introduction of the principles of the ECHR on Sark, for which the British government is responsible, the citizens of this rogue Island will, in blatant breach of ECHR, remain oppressed by an unelected mob, subjected to a regime which can only be described as fascist.

The hypocrisy of the UK government is there for all to see. Although a founding signatory to the ECHR and despite being responsible on an international level for the good governance of Sark, they have allowed this Crown Dependency to function under the powers of one unelected Michael Beaumont and now his son Christopher Beaumont in obvious breach of the Convention. They have permitted the Island of Sark to develop into a fascist dictatorship under the unelected Beaumont family; a dictatorship with a sham one ruling party parliament, the members of which are not elected by the people, do not represent the people and do not protect the interests of the people but are instead chosen by the unelected feudal lord and his inner circle to represent the views and protect the interests of the unelected feudal lord and his one ruling party state members and supporters.

In breach of ECHR, Sark’s unelected government is itself unlawful. As are the decisions it makes, the legislation it votes through and the taxes it attempts to raise taxes to fund its own continuation.


12th January 2017


Christopher Beaumont was proud and pleased to inherit a lawless Island where the unelected members of the one ruling party state parliament make up laws and regulations in accordance with his constitution.

He is proud and comfortable with being the owner and an unaccountable ruler of a lawless Island hallmarked by the mob rule of unelected people who, like himself, have no mandate to govern, no mandate to pass legislation and no mandate to raise taxes.


As the owner of the Crown Lease on the Fief of Sark, feudal lord Christopher Beaumont is the Island’s undisputed supreme leader. Although a private individual accountable to no one, courtesy of his inherited lease Beaumont owns the constitution and the jurisdiction of Sark and he appoints the judges and officials of his own court. He holds dictatorial powers not seen in Europe since the rise of Hitler's Germany in the 1930s.

These are the same powers and privileges which his father Michael Beaumont managed to retain under Sark's deeply flawed Reform Laws of 2008 and 2010, through Machiavellian manoeuvrings behind the scenes and powers which he exercised, with the indispensable assistance of his right-hand man Reginald Guille and his left-hand man Edric Baker, to establish his Fief as a totalitarian one ruling party state in which he, like Hitler in 1930s’ Germany, was the unassailable and undisputed supreme ruler. The Crown Dependency of Sark became subject to mob rule instead of the democracy its people were promised.

Along with the position of supreme ruler with powers and privileges that are incompatible with democracy in any shape or form, absentee feudal lord Christopher Beaumont also inherited from his avaricious father substantial wealth in the form of property and money. Property and money which the late Michael Beaumont amassed partly by exercising his feudal powers and privileges to the full - by assiduously collecting his Treizième, his personal 7.69% tax on all property sales. All of which went straight into his own pocket, partly by claiming for himself all property and worldly goods of Islanders dying intestate, partly by preying on the weak and vulnerable and, most notably, by trading on his status as Seigneur of Sark and prostituting his Island by signing on as director with thousands of letterbox companies in far flung tax havens around the world. Over 650 directorships in Panama alone - shell companies that serve no commercial purpose and exist only to facilitate financial crimes such as tax evasion, laundering the proceeds of crime and the funding of terrorism.

Regardless of the huge reputational damage he thereby caused, both to Sark itself and the Channel Islands in general, the "Sark Lark" made Michael Beaumont a rich man, a "fabulous legacy" now enjoyed by his son and heir. Whether his son Christopher also inherited lucrative positions in offshore shell companies is an open question.

Where Sark's autocratic feudal lord leads, his inner circle of supporters - and anyone else deemed worthy to be invited into this exclusive club - will inevitably follow. The "Sark Lark", and later its more modern permutations of unregulated "offshore financial services" provided Sark's leading families with easy money. As an illustration, one single directorship can today pay £10,000 a year.

Not only the highly privileged Beaumont family, but close feudal / fascist supporters like the extended family of Reginald Guille, members of the Beaumonts’ unelected one ruling party parliament like Paul Williams, Sandra Williams, Alan Blythe and William Raymond, court officials like deputy judge Ewan de Carteret and Greffier Trevor Hamon or such as state officials like treasurer Wendy Kiernan, committee secretary Caroline Robins or state tribunal member Bertha Cole. The ruling elite of the Beaumont family’s totalitarian one ruling party state jumped onto the lucrative gravy train of “offshore financial services” operated well below the radar of international regulators.

The political decision-making process as well as the administration of the British Crown Dependency of Sark is endemically corrupted by unregulated lucrative offshore activities, the proceeds from which are untaxed, unregistered and uncontrolled on Christopher Beaumont’s lawless Island. Sark’s unelected and unmandated rulers, from the Beaumont family down to their lowly servants on the various one ruling party state tribunals, are free to destroy the Island’s economy because, unlike the population at large, they don’t depend on it to provide the income that funds their lives here.

Sark Electricity Ltd’s quarterly update, circulated to Island households this week, states that in 2014 there were 7 empty commercial properties in Sark. In 2015 the figure had grown to 11, and in 2016 to 16. Now, in January 2017 there are 23. A record 7 commercial enterprises have closed their doors for good on this tiny Island over the past year alone, and today the news broke that Sark Vineyards Ltd is closing down too. As SEL director David Gordon-Brown so succinctly puts it, "the exodus of business from Sark continues". The economic cleansing of Sark by an unelected and unmandated totalitarian regime, the likes of which has not been seen in Europe since Germany of the 1930s, is near complete.

An unelected mob akin to Nazi brownshirts has created a political climate in which commercial enterprise cannot survive, let alone make a profit, unless it is state-owned or state-sponsored. An unelected mob which has shown it will stop at nothing - be it creating targeted legislation or devising punitive taxes, or be it state-sponsored boycotts or state-condoned vandalism - to destroy all commercial or financial interests that are not their own. With the encouragement of the unelected Christopher Beaumont and funded by lucrative unregulated “offshore financial services”, a self-serving and unelected fascist mob has destroyed the Island of Sark - its economy and its future.


6th January 2017


Feudal lord Christopher Beaumont inherited the Crown Lease on the Fief of Sark from the 22nd Seigneur of Sark Michael Beaumont. Like his father before him, Christopher Beaumont, an unelected private individual, is thereby owner of the constitution, jurisdiction and judiciary of the British Crown Dependency of Sark. Also like his father before him, Christopher Beaumont has clearly no intention of giving up his autocratic power over every aspect of life on his Island. He has, with his actions and words, made it patently clear that the apple does not fall far from the tree - Sark’s 23rd feudal lord will not under any circumstances give up the unelected powers and privileges which ensure that his Island remains a totalitarian fascist mini-state instead of developing into the democracy his people were promised eight long years ago.

In one respect only Christopher Beaumont differs from his father. Although publicly boasting of the "fabulous legacy" of power, status, property and wealth left to him by his avaricious father - and although having no hesitation in collecting his annual, taxpayer-funded, index-linked stipend, currently over £35,000 a year, plus unpublished expenses in return for unspecified duties - Christopher Beaumont clearly has no intention of living in Sark.

Someone must hold the fort whilst the feudal lord resides comfortably at a secret location in the UK. Christopher Beaumont picked the deeply unpopular feudal fundamentalist Janet Guy to act as his unelected deputy and exercise his autocratic power in his absence - a choice obviously made under the guidance of his father’s chief enforcer and right-hand man Reginald Guille, to whom the new feudal lord has openly admitted he turns to whenever he needs advice.

However extensive deputy Seigneur Janet Guy’s powers are, and regardless of how much she knows best, she alone cannot be trusted to ensure that nothing and no-one is permitted to threaten the totalitarian one ruling party state so carefully established by the late Michael Beaumont and his chief enforcer Reginald Guille.

That is why Guille, who only "retired" from the position of unelected "president" of Sark’s one ruling party parliament a couple of months ago, has stepped into the arena again, still unelected but this time, we are meant to believe, as a mere member of the assembly over which he ruled for 16 years with a rod of iron.

No one is fooled. For 16 years this Island has been under the jackboot of the unelected and unmandated Reginald Guille acting on behalf of his feudal lord, and he is not giving up any time soon. Alongside Janet Guy, Guille will continue to be the chief enforcer of the mob rule of Sark’s feudal lord, ensuring that Sark remains a rogue fascist state with frightening parallels to fascist Germany of the 1930s.


29th December 2016



As we prepare to welcome in the New Year there is nothing for the people to celebrate in the British Crown Dependency of Sark. Eight years of economic cleansing the likes of which have not been seen in Western Europe since 1930's Germany have left the people with only desperation and despair.

•  Like 1930's Germany, Sark is a totalitarian one ruling party state headed by an unaccountable dictator, feudal lord Christopher Beaumont.

•  Like 1930's Germany, the members of the one ruling party state parliament are accountable to the dictator and his chosen elite rather than to the people.

•  Like the people of 1930's Germany, the people of Sark are subjected to mob rule under an unelected 'government' that has no mandate to pass laws, no mandate to enforce those laws and no mandate to raise taxes.

•  Like the people of 1930's Germany, the people of Sark are the victims of economic cleansing by an unelected one ruling party regime intent on ridding the totalitarian regime of anyone suspected of disagreeing with their fascist views and policies.

•  In Sark, as we enter 2017, the members of an unelected 'government' - a mob which represents the needs and interests of no one except themselves and their unelected dictator - will pass laws and raise taxes to fund themselves and punish enemies of the one ruling party state. Just like in Germany of the 1930s.

•  In today's one ruling party of Sark, the fascist regime's servants can and will, akin to the brownshirts of 1930s' Germany, seize people's assets at the drop of a hat, a power they will use to force the population to conform to the regime's wishes.

•  Although a British Crown Dependency, the citizens of the lawless Island of Sark are subject to mob rule under a totalitarian fascist regime. Not one member of the regime has faced the electorate. Not one member has received a single vote from the people.

We do not live in the 1930s. In today's world - outside of Sark, that is - no unelected government will be considered legitimate. No legitimate government can, as has Sark's one ruling party regime, mandate itself. In order to be a legitimate government that makes legitimate decisions, a government must be mandated by the people that it governs. Without a mandate to govern it cannot legitimately pass laws and raise taxes.

Feudal lord Christopher Beaumont's unelected one ruling party mob of a "government" has no such mandate. No mandate to make laws, no mandate to enforce those laws and no mandate to fund their one ruling party state by raising taxes. The people of Sark are under no obligation to pay those taxes. They are under no obligation to fund the continuation of the fascist regime which is oppressing them and destroying their Island. No court in the free world would support the legitimacy of any demands of a fascist mob "government" which is populated by one ruling party state officials, none of whom have faced the electorate or received a single vote.


15th December 2016


Within a matter of a few short weeks Sark’s one ruling party state will send out tax demands across the Island. Despite having not faced the electorate, having not received a single vote and having no mandate from the people to govern over them Sark’s fascist regime will demand that the people of Sark hand over their hard earned cash to unelected state officials to spend as they see fit.

Nowhere in the free world can an unelected and unmandated ‘government’ led by an unelected and unaccountable autocratic leader levy and collect taxes on behalf of the state. In the British Crown Dependency of Sark this will not stop the unelected members of Christopher Beaumont’s totalitarian regime attempting to extort money from the people to fund their totalitarian regime.

Tax cannot be imposed by unelected state officials who have no mandate to do so. Moreover, no independent court of law will enforce the payment of such taxes or fine people for not paying them. No independent court of law will uphold the extortion of money from a population ruled over by an unelected and unmandated one ruling party state accountable to no one other than their unelected autocratic leader.

Sark is a state akin to that of 1930’s Germany. The people of Sark, like the people of Germany in the 1930’s, are ruled over by state officials who have not faced the electorate, have not received a single vote and have no mandate to govern. Like Germany in the 1930’s there is no separation between those who make the laws and those who enforce them. All is within the state, nothing outside the state and nothing against the state.

Like Germany in the 1930’s the unelected and unmandated one party state officials in Sark have committed crimes against humanity that could not happen in a democratic society. A state-sponsored campaign of economic destruction has seen the island’s population decimated from a high of 650 year-round residents in December 2008 to below 420 today, a drop of 35%.

Sark’s totalitarian regime have pursued an economic “scorched earth” policy that has ensured that the elderly are uncared for, the children are denied a full and proper education and the weak and vulnerable are left to fend for themselves. At the same time land and property values have crashed to an all-time low and non-state sanctioned businesses, both large and small, have boarded up and closed their doors for good.

When the autocratic leader Christopher Beaumont’s unelected state officials send out their tax demands in early January they are not collecting taxes on behalf of the state to be spent on caring for our elderly, educating our children or meeting the needs of our weak and vulnerable. They are instead attempting to extort money from the people of Sark to provide paid employment and cash benefits for the members and supporters of the one ruling party state. They are extorting money to pay an absentee dictator, Christopher Beaumont, a stipend and undisclosed expenses that equate to the sum raised from 100 basic rate tax payers.

No one on Sark should give into extortion by the state. It is the right of the people to withhold their taxes until such a time as the Island has a fully representative democratic government. There is not a court in the free world that would disagree.


8th December 2016


As was the case in 1930s' Germany, the people of Sark are ruled by a one ruling party "government" in which no member has faced the electorate, no member has received a single vote and no member has been elected. They have no mandate to govern, no mandate to make laws and no mandate to raise taxes.

In 2016 the people of Sark, a British Crown Dependency, are living under the rule of a fascist regime headed up by an absentee dictator, Christopher Beaumont. The powers vested in him through the Crown Lease he inherited from his father, the avaricious Michael Beaumont, cannot be found in the hands of one private individual anywhere else across the free world. Despite this, the British Crown and the UK Ministry of Justice continue to turn a blind eye to the crimes against humanity that have been committed by a regime intent on holding onto power at any cost.

Sark in 2016 is no different to the fascist Germany of the 1930s, where power was obtained by the "Brownshirts" on their leader’s behalf. As was the case during this dark chapter in European history, anyone in Sark who dissents from the one ruling party-line is subjected to persecution by the state. A boycott of non-state sanctioned businesses has been rigidly adhered to by members and supporters of the Beaumont family’s one ruling party state.

Such are the overwhelming numbers of Beaumont's "Brownshirts", as the late dictator Michael Beaumont’s enforcers were known, that they did not have to take to daubing warnings on the doors of businesses deemed to be operated by ‘enemies of the state’. They merely needed to let it be known amongst the population at large that a business was not approved by the state to guarantee a boycott and the inevitable demise of the enterprise.

This policy, Sark's "Final Solution" has resulted in an unprecedented depopulation of the Island, from 650 year-round residents in December 2008 to below 420 today. As businesses were forced to close due to the might of the state being turned against them, jobs were destroyed, and there is no sign of them coming back. Family after family were left with no alternative but to pack up and leave with barely the shirts on their backs as the unelected one ruling party state officials basked in the success of their economic cleansing. Not since 1930s' Germany has the free world witnessed such crimes against humanity by the state.

Predictably, in further and terrifying parallels with 1930s-style fascism, numerous tactics have been deployed by Sark’s totalitarian regime to deny the people’s right to freedom of speech and to close down the free press. Every weapon in the one ruling party state's armoury has been used against Sark resident Kevin Delaney, the Editor of this publication and its predecessor, the Sark Newsletter.

The Editor has had to face threats of physical violence from members of the one ruling party state, state-organised vandalism to his home and to businesses under his management and the threat of being shot by the partner of a member of the one ruling party state parliament. When it became clear to the totalitarian regime that these tactics were not going to silence the only source of independent news reporting in Sark, they resorted to more sinister and desperate tactics.

Under the organisation of Janet Guy, Christopher Beaumont’s carefully selected deputy dictator, who, despite his protestations, has no mandate to rule over the people of Sark, a march was organised. Members and supporters of Sark’s fascist regime, posing as ordinary members of the public, demonstrated to try to close down the free press. When this failed, over fifty members and supporters of Sark’s totalitarian regime lodged a claim of criminal harassment with the Guernsey police against Mr Delaney, leaving him facing the threat of financial ruin and, for the first time in his life, a criminal record.

One has only to look at the reluctance of the local Channel Island media to criticise Sark’s totalitarian regime to understand the power of this 21st century fatwa. The people of Sark are ruled by a government that has no mandate to govern and no mandate to pass laws. The people of Sark have every right to refuse to pay the taxes that the one ruling party state has no mandate to raise.


1st December 2016


In a cynical and calculated programme of economic cleansing, the likes of which has not been seen in Western Europe since fascist Germany of the 1930s, Sark's late feudal lord Michael Beaumont, aided and abetted by his chief enforcer Reginald Guille, spent 8 years systematically destroying the Island's economy.

Michael Beaumont's ownership of Sark's constitution, its jurisdiction and his own court, ensured that his autocratic powers would be consolidated and increased throughout the tenure of his 40-year rule. As was the case in Hitler's Germany, Beaumont could not do this on his own. He needed individuals who would set aside the standards of common decency and morality that underpin democratic states the world over and who would stoop to any depth in defence of the feudal lord's totalitarian regime.

In the former serviceman Reginald Guille, Michael Beaumont found the perfect partner for his crimes against humanity. A bully who would stop at nothing to achieve his objective, Guille would not even sip from a glass of wine when in the company of Beaumont until given a nod of approval by his power-hungry feudal lord.

Guille's re-emergence as an unelected member of Sark's one ruling party state"parliament signals that the final steps on the road to Sark’s "final solution’ are set to get underway and anyone who fails to sign up as a member or supporter of Sark's one ruling party state will face the terror of the majority. Even today, as the Sark Newspaper goes to print, Islanders are reminded of Michael Beaumont’s edict that nobody is to be allowed emergency evacuations from Sark, even for urgent medical treatment. Such was the determination of the late feudal lord to ensure that nothing and nobody would dictate how he ran the last fascist state in Western Europe, that he refused to put the needs of his own wife above his own determination to cling to power. On a gale-swept winter’s night, in mountainous seas, he condemned his wife to being transferred to Guernsey on the floor of an ill-equipped boat rather than setting his perverse ideological dogma to one side and putting the well-being of his life-long partner above anything else.

Rather than allowing his wife, who had suffered a serious stroke, to be evacuated to Guernsey on a 6-minute helicopter transfer, he chose instead to submit his frail and seriously ill wife to an hour's unimaginably terrifying sea crossing, thereby also delaying for an hour and a half urgent medical treatment. Today, with the announcement of the passing of Diana Beaumont, her family mourns, as does the whole Island, for the loss of a mother, a grandmother, a sister, an aunt and a fellow Islander. The people of Sark also question what impact the negligence of her callous husband on that windswept winter’s night had on her health throughout the final years of her life.

The passing of Diana Beaumont has also brought into sharp focus the fact that Michael Beaumont's legacy is set to continue. To this day, Islanders are denied the right to a safe, fast and efficient emergency evacuation by helicopter because of the policy set by their late fascist dictator.

Another legacy set to continue is Michael Beaumont’s economic "scorched earth" policy - Sark's "final solution". The appointment of the late feudal lord's chief enforcer Reginald Guille as an unelected member of the one ruling party state parliament will ensure that the policy of economic destruction, which he and his feudal lord devised 8 years ago, will continue to be implemented, relentlessly and unhindered. Reginald Guille will personally see to it that the ‘final solution’ is adhered to and carried out by the unelected rank and file, as well as the unelected leaders of Sark's one ruling party regime. The tragedy is that we all know full well he is capable of achieving his objective.


25th November 2016.



The avaricious and grasping Michael Beaumont never once condemned the attacks on the free press in Sark. To him, openness and accountability to the people of the Island and the outside world at large was unthinkable. How could he continue to line his own pockets year in and year out through his involvement with unregulated financial services if he was going to be subject to the scrutiny of the press? He was instrumental in encouraging his one ruling party state members to pose as ordinary members of the public in a state-sponsored protest march calling for the closure of the free press in his Island; an act of one ruling party state propaganda worthy of Joseph Goebbels in Germany of the 1930s.


Christopher Beaumont, the latest dictator to hold Sark in his iron grip through his ownership of the constitution, the jurisdiction and the judiciary, has made it clear by his refusal to meet with the Editor of this publication that he will, to the detriment of the people of Sark, be carrying on where his father left off. His engagement with the media will be confined only to those news organisations who fail to challenge his dictatorial powers. When a ruler such as Beaumont refuses to engage with any media who challenges or opposes his rule, then that leader is a dictator and there can be no such thing as freedom of speech in Sark at all.


The deeply divisive deputy Seigneur Janet Guy has been richly rewarded for her commitment to perpetuating the totalitarian regime in Sark. On the face of it, she and the Island’s current dictator do not make obvious political bedfellows: she, a proponent of left wing control of every aspect of peoples’ lives, from cradle to grave. He, with the dictatorial credentials of fascist leader, the likes of which have not been seen in Europe since 1930s’ Germany. They are united in their lust for power and desire to hold onto power at any cost, regardless of the consequences for the people of Sark.


17th November 2016


Sark's feudal lord and dictator Christopher Beaumont has declared publicly that he is proud to inherit a near bankrupt Island with no hope or future. He has shown, in his short term in office, that he is just as avaricious as his father, the late feudal lord and dictator Michael Beaumont and that self-interest and the accumulation of personal wealth will define his autocratic rule over the people of Sark regardless of the cost to them. Under his totalitarian regime, as the latest member of the Beaumont family to assume autocratic powers, the likes of which have not been seen since 1930s’ Germany, he will ensure that the needs of the Island’s elderly will go unheeded, the rights of the Island’s children to have a full education will remain ignored and that, as a result of his one ruling party state’s economic cleansing, the depopulation of Sark will continue as the economy continues its decline.


The deeply unpopular Janet Guy is relishing being empowered to implement the ‘scorched earth’ policies of her feudal lord and dictator Christopher Beaumont. Her undisguised hunger for power is legendary amongst the people of Sark. An anarchist who boasts of her involvement with political pressure groups, she personifies the dried-up husk that is the one ruling party of Sark. Guy’s Sark is based only in the "here and now", on what the Island can offer her and her partner, the some-time shopkeeper Katie Hamon, during their dotage years. Guy has no interest in the future of the Island, as evidenced by her failure to fight for the rights of the children of Sark to a full education. The ex-headmistress of the Sark School will do nothing for the Island's people. Her lust for power will condemn the working men and women of Sark to many more years of economic cleansing akin to that of 1930s' Germany


11th November 2016


Deputy Seigneur Janet Guy is a fascist enforcer - unelected, but appointed by Sark's absentee feudal lord Christopher Beaumont. This is a man who recently inherited, courtesy of a Crown Lease, extensive autocratic powers that are unequalled in the western world. A Crown Lease which bestows on Beaumont, whilst accountable to no one, ownership of Sark's constitution and jurisdiction. It also empowers him with ownership and control of his own court and the power to appoint his own judge. The appointment of Janet Guy - who is mandated by the feudal lord alone - has been made so as to enforce his extensive and autocratic powers in his absence.

With the clearest of parallels to the European fascist states of the 1930s, the unelected Janet Guy, an individual with an insatiable lust for power, has been appointed by the unelected feudal lord to preserve his one ruling party state and his all-powerful position. The people of Sark, to whom the deeply unpopular and divisive Guy is well known, will understand that she is only too willing to do so.


3rd November 2016


Feudal lord Christopher Beaumont has no mandate from the people of Sark to preside over, dominate and control a one ruling party system of government reminiscent of a European fascist state of the 1930s.

Nor did the unelected absentee feudal lord have a mandate from the people of Sark to appoint the deeply unpopular Janet Guy, the most inept, incompetent and divisive person on this Island, who played a significant role in the one ruling party’s destruction of Sark’s tourist industry and economy, to be his lieutenant and exercise his powers in his absence.

Sadly for the people of Sark, their feudal lord needs no such mandate. He owns this Island - its constitution, its jurisdiction and its judiciary. Despite the Reform Laws of 2008 and 2010, which were meant to bring democracy, there is no such thing as government by the people for the people in Sark. The Island is governed for the feudal lord by the feudal/fascist one ruling party regime established by the late Seigneur Michael Beaumont.

Like father, like son; Christopher Beaumont has followed in his footsteps and shown that he intends to exercise all the dictatorial rights he inherited under the Crown Lease along with substantial wealth and property.

Like father, like son; Christopher Beaumont will no doubt also make himself richer in the process by exercising the antiquated privileges, such as seizing for himself the property and worldly goods of Islanders dying without a will. He will no doubt take his annual, taxpayer-funded, index-regulated stipend, now over £33,000 a year, and he will no doubt continue to claim his expenses without declaring what they are.

In breach of all the principles of democracy and natural justice safeguarding the people across the UK and all the other British Crown Dependencies, Sark’s feudal lord needs no mandate from anyone. Accountable to no one, he can, and does, do as he likes in his feudal/fascist Fief.


27th October 2016


No one in Sark voted for Christopher Beaumont. No one in Sark voted for the deeply disliked Janet Guy. No one in Sark is able to vote either of them out of office - with distinct parallels to Germany of the 1930s - and no one can challenge the policies they set and the way they choose to exercise their unelected power over others. Again reminiscent of 1930s’ Germany.

Courtesy of his inherited Crown Lease and accompanying tax-free fortune consisting of blood money - the “fabulous legacy” left to him by his father Michael Beaumont - Christopher Beaumont, accountable to no one, presides over, dominates and controls his Island’s political decision-making process as well as every aspect of life thereon. Again with undeniable parallels to Germany of the 1930s.

What did he hope to achieve by choosing Janet Guy as the executor of his autocratic powers in his absence? Did he spare a thought for the people for whose welfare he has responsibility under his Crown Lease - people who cannot challenge what Janet Guy does in his name?

Certainly not. By entrusting the obviously incompetent but militantly opinionated and blinkered Janet Guy to exercise his autocratic powers in his stead, Christopher Beaumont has shown the people of Sark and the world at large that the apple doesn’t fall far from the tree; he’s a chip off the old ‘Michael Beaumont’ block. It tells us all we need to know about the integrity and morality of Christopher Beaumont, the 23rd feudal lord of Sark.

Like his father before him, he totally lacks compassion for the people over whom he holds totalitarian power. As long as he can keep his inherited power, privileges and blood money, he is happy for his one ruling party to stifle Sark’s economy by blocking desperately needed investment and actively preventing the economic activity that provides employment for the working population. He doesn’t care that the policies he and his deputy support are depopulating the Island in a process equivalent to 1930s-style ethnic cleansing. It doesn’t matter to him that his is an Island where there is no welfare for the elderly, the sick and the unemployed - and that Sark’s children, uniquely in the British Isles, can only achieve GCSE-level education if their parents can afford to pay for it.

By appointing Janet Guy to rule over Sark in his absence, Christopher Beaumont has sealed the fate of Sark. Like Germany of the 1930s it is a totalitarian state with no hope and no future.


21st October 2016


•  Like fascist Germany of the 1930s, the British Crown Dependency of Sark has an autocratic and authoritarian leader who holds draconian powers and is accountable to no one.

•  Like fascist Germany of the 1930s, the other principals of Sark’s government are not elected but chosen by the autocratic and all-powerful leader.

•  Like fascist Germany of the 1930s, the body of Sark’s government is either wholly unelected - appointed by the one ruling party and its members - or elevated to office through sham elections.

•  Like fascist Germany of the 1930s, the totalitarian state of Sark has a one ruling party system of government where there is no opposition, neither from opposition parties nor from individuals because opposition is not tolerated.

•  Like fascist Germany of the 1930s, those opposed to Sark’s one ruling party and its unelected leaders and members are perceived as ‘enemies of the state’ and deported from the Island through economic cleansing and/or state-sponsored harassment campaigns.

•  Like fascist Germany of the 1930s, Sark’s system of government is devised to allow an unelected feudal/fascist elite to hold absolute control over the lives of others.

Without vision and ideas, devoid of logic and morally bankrupt, Sark’s unelected feudal lord and his feudal/fascist one ruling party assert their unelected but totalitarian authority on the population of Sark and are actively employing such strategies as were practiced in Europe’s fascist states in the 1930s, to uphold their own and their one ruling party regime’s absolute power. Regardless of the devastating effects their actions have on what remains of Sark’s population which has shrunk for 650 in 2008 to less than 420 today and is expected to diminish rapidly this coming winter. Regardless of the suffering they inflict in the form of unemployment, depopulation and hardship. Intent only on holding on to power, they are indifferent to the fact that they are destroying Sark; its economy, its population and its future.

To call Sark’s system of government corrupt is the under-statement of the century. Fully deserving of comparison with Germany of the 1930s, it is unacceptable. Rotten to the core, it is an insupportable embarrassment to the Crown, to the UK government and its Ministry of Justice and to the Channel Islands as a whole.


13th October 2016


Unelected feudal lord Christopher Beaumont, who, courtesy of his inherited Crown Lease, also inherited ownership and control over Sark’s constitution, jurisdiction and judiciary and more power than any crowned head or elected leader in the civilised world, has. With open contempt for democratic principles and the people over whom he holds unaccountable and autocratic power, he has exercised his feudal right to appoint his own deputy.

For the people of Sark the appointment is important in view of the fact that the feudal lord doesn’t reside here and has no plans to do so in the immediate future. His deputy, accountable only to the feudal lord, who is also accountable to no one, will exercise his extensive powers in his absence.

With clear parallels to fascist Germany of the 1930s, Sark’s unelected leader Christopher Beaumont chose as his deputy the deeply unpopular and equally unelected Janet Guy, a one ruling party fundamentalist whose long and ignoble record in Sark public life shows her to have no more respect for democratic principles than the feudal lord does himself. She is a safe pair of hands, certain to do her utmost to ensure that nothing is permitted to threaten the feudal/fascist one ruling party state and the unelected feudal lord’s position as its autocratic and all-powerful owner and leader.