20th July 2017

A FEUDAL LORD FAILING IN HIS BASIC DUTY TO PROTECT HER MAJESTY’S TERRITORY AND CITIZENS

For 57 weeks unelected absentee feudal lord Christopher Beaumont has ignored our appeal on behalf of his Island’s people to use his extensive power under Sark’s constitution to introduce border control on the Island. His father and predecessor Michael Beaumont ignored the same appeal for 127 weeks.

Sark’s unprotected borders are a threat to the security and safety not only of the Island’s own people but also that of the over 65 million citizens of the entire UK Common Travel Area.

The sole reason why the Crown Lease which Christopher Beaumont now owns was created in the first place - the only reason why Helier de Carteret became the first Seigneur of Sark back in 1565 - was to protect Her Majesty’s territory, i.e. the UK’s borders, with 40 armed men to “keep the Island free of the Queen’s enemies”.

The British government has long since taken over the responsibility for the military protection of Sark. However, the Queen’s enemies are not just foreign armies, they are also terrorists, drug smugglers, gun runners or other criminals. All of whom can be repelled from Her Majesty’s territory by a vigilant border control.

By refusing to have border control in his jurisdiction, absentee feudal lord Christopher Beaumont, the 23rd Seigneur of Sark, is not only failing to provide protection for Her Majesty’s citizens in Sark, Guernsey, Jersey, the Isle of Man and mainland UK, he is actively obstructing their security.

The Crown must revoke the lease on the Fief of Sark for the simple reason that its current owner, Christopher Beaumont, has, like his late father before him, made it abundantly clear he has no intention whatsoever of honouring the basic principle on which that Crown Lease was created.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


13th July 2017

SARK’S FEUDAL LORD CHRISTOPHER BEAUMONT:
IN BREACH OF THE FEUDAL COVENANT


Last week the Sark Newspaper reported extensively on Sark’s constitution and how the Island’s feudal lord’s control and ownership of it gives him power that far exceeds that of his sham parliament. Democracy cannot exist where an unelected hereditary feudal lord retains controlling power over the constitution, the political decision-making process, the judiciary and the land. It is contrary to all principles of democracy. The people of Sark are deprived of the freedom and benefits that democracy brings. Despite the Reform Laws of 2008 and 2010 the British Crown Dependency of Sark is still feudal.

The feudal system is one of mutual obligations - a covenant - between the feudal lord and his vassals:

“Feudal duties ran both ways, both up and down the feudal hierarchy; however, aside from distribution of land and maintenance of landless retainers, the main obligation of the feudal lord was to protect his vassals, both militarily from incursion and judicially via court justice.”

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feudal_duties

Like his late father Michael Beaumont, absentee feudal lord Christopher Beaumont is failing in his main duties to the people of Sark. By refusing to establish border control and fit-for-purpose policing, he is failing to protect them physically. Through his own court, which through nepotism, incompetence and vested interests is incapable of delivering justice, he is failing to protect them judicially too. The vassals of still-feudal Sark are as deprived of the benefits of feudalism as they are of the benefits and freedom of democracy.

By reneging on his main obligations to his people whilst enjoying the power, status and privileges that his position gives him under Sark’s constitution - enjoying absolute power and ignoring the responsibility it entails - Christopher Beaumont is in clear breach of his feudal Crown Lease. The Crown has every right, and indeed a duty, to take it back.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


7th July 2017

SARK’S UNIQUE CONSTITUTION

This is the Oxford Dictionary’s definition of “constitution”:

“A body of fundamental principles or established precedents according to which a state or other organisation is acknowledged to be governed.”

https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/constitution

In the introduction to his booklet “The Constitution and Administration of Sark” of 1993, the late feudal lord, Michael Beaumont, wrote that his intention was to “bring together all the principal law and customs that together form the constitution of the Island.” In the chapter entitled “The Constitutional Position of Sark” he confirms that:

“Its present constitution was originally framed under a Royal Charter of 1565, reinforced by letters Patent in 1611.”

Historic UK, an organisation promoting the history and heritage of the UK, explains it like this:

“In 1565 Queen Elizabeth I rewarded Helier by granting him the feudal title of fief, with an obligation to maintain 40 households and men with arms to defend the island and to pay the Crown the twentieth part of a knight’s fee annually for the privilege – in today’s money that is about £1.79! This royal recognition formally established the constitutional basis which survives on Sark to this present day.”

http://www.historic-uk.com/HistoryMagazine/DestinationsUK/Sark/

The fundamental principles and established precedents according to which Sark is governed are to this day based on a piece of paper owned by successive unelected members of the Beaumont family, namely the Crown Lease that Elizabeth I granted to Helier de Carteret in 1565.

Various amendments and legislation have been introduced since then, the latest being the much tinkered with Reform Laws of 2008 and 2010. However, none of these amendments and laws do anything to alter the basic fact that Sark’s constitution is firmly based on the feudal lord’s ownership of it. No Sark parliament, whether elected or unelected, has the power to take that ownership away from the Beaumont family. No Sark government, and no UK government for that matter, has the right or the power to take away from Christopher Beaumont the constitution that he inherited - an inheritance which very efficiently prevents democracy from taking hold on this Island.

Sark is one man’s Island; Sark is the personal property of one man who, like all dictators throughout history, controls the lives, the livelihoods and the future of the people.

It is unique, extraordinary and outrageous in equal measures that the only jurisdiction in the free world where one man, the son and heir of the late Michael Beaumont, owns the constitution and has controlling power over the lives of people who have no representatives in an unelected parliament in a British Crown Dependency. That, however, is what Sark’s constitution in practice means for this Island’s people.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


29th June 2017

EVIDENCE THAT SARK IS A DICTATORSHIP

“There is no legislative basis upon which to hold a referendum in Sark.”
Unelected ‘lead politicians’ Charles Maitland and Robert Cottle

This was made in a ‘press statement’ issued by the one ruling party state of Sark on 21st June 2017 and repeated in a follow-up mailshot with the same wording on Tuesday of this week.

It is clear that in the absence of any Sark legislation with regard to the holding of referendums, the one-party state and its unelected leaders consider themselves entitled to ignore the will of the people. A referendum of any kind should be welcomed. There is nothing more democratic. A referendum directly reflects the wish of the people. As we saw in the UK last year, in a democracy a referendum result overrules the government of the day because it expresses the will of the people who voted that government into office.

In the absence of any elections, the so-called ‘government’ fronted by the self-appointed would-be ‘chief minister’ Charles Maitland and the self-appointed would-be ‘minister for economy’ Robert Cottle were never voted into office by the people of Sark in the first place. Now they have made it absolutely clear that no referendum results will be recognised by them. The will of the people is immaterial in the one-party state of Sark.

As it has always been in any dictatorship throughout history, be it fascist Germany of the 1930s, Stalin’s Russia or Kim Jong-un’s North Korea.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


22nd June 2017

LIBERTY

In the UK two well known newspapers have joined together across the political divide, resolute and united in their belief in liberty and what it means:

“If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear." - Orson Welles

The Sark Newspaper could not agree more. As far as the press is concerned, this liberty is enshrined in Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights:

“Everyone has the right to freedom of expression. This right shall include freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart information and ideas without interference by public authority and regardless of frontiers.”

As reported in this publication, this is a universal liberty which the unelected rulers of Sark have done their utmost to deprive the Island’s people of. Be it by organising state-sponsored ‘demonstrations’ against the free press or attempting to sue the Editor for criminal harassment, they have unsuccessfully tried to close down the free press that is holding them to account in the public interest. They have unsuccessfully tried to deprive the Sark public of their right to receive that information.

Neither Sark’s unelected absentee feudal lord Christopher Beaumont nor the unelected members of his one-party parliament want to hear what the Sark Newspaper has to say, nor, for that matter do the Crown, the UK Ministry of Justice or the democratically elected government of Guernsey. They too would dearly like to see the Sark Newspaper closed down for exposing inconvenient truths which they don’t want to hear.

The concept of liberty does, however, go far beyond the freedom to receive and impart information. Everywhere else in the civilised world liberty is taken for granted in all aspects of life, from governance, economy and enterprise to social, educational and humanitarian matters but not in Sark.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


15th June 2017

NOTHING BUT CONTEMPT AND INDIFFERENCE FROM
SARK'S UNELECTED ABSENTEE FEUDAL LORD

A new summer - and it is coming up to a full year since Christopher Beaumont inherited his “fabulous legacy” of autocratic power, substantial wealth and property from the late feudal lord Michael Beaumont.

When Christopher Beaumont first arrived in Sark, clearly unprepared for his role despite his late father’s advanced years, the Sark Newspaper asked whether his succession to Sark’s carved ‘throne’ heralded a new dawn for Sark. In the hope that the arrival of a new, younger and presumably more enlightened feudal lord was the precursor to a new beginning in which Sark could build a viable future, we gave Christopher Beaumont time and space to show his people that he was one apple that had rolled far away from the tree.

To prompt the unelected feudal lord with controlling power and ownership over Sark’s constitution, jurisdiction and judiciary to share his views, hopes and aspirations for his Island with its people, the Sark Newspaper asked a series of questions:

Does Christopher Beaumont envisage a Sark which continues as it is - as a sham democracy, a one ruling party state with a one ruling party parliament, the members of which are carefully selected rather than elected by the people?

Does he envisage an isolated Sark which is a gated community for a well-off elderly population of independent means with a collapsed, unsustainable economy which doesn’t support a working population?

Does he find it acceptable that his Island is being depopulated and that it is losing its young?

Does he envisage his parliament continuing down the road of wilful economic destruction by maintaining a hostile political climate in which only state-owned or state-sponsored businesses can survive?

Does he envisage his Island being able to go on balancing its books by increasing the tax burden on a diminishing number of taxpayers?

Does he envisage his Island remaining a centre for unregulated “offshore financial services”?

Does he envisage his Island remaining a paradise for criminals and fraudsters of any kind; that the special position and unique circumstances of his Island are exploited by people who can come and go as they like, no questions asked?

Does he envisage his Island - his people and himself and his family - being held hostage forever into the future by a state-owned, monopoly operating shipping ‘life-line’ which is financially unviable, unsustainable in its current form and unable to operate anywhere else than the stretch between Guernsey and Sark?

Does he envisage a Sark where the feudal landholding system is rigidly upheld?

Does he envisage his Sark as a totalitarian state in which dissent is not tolerated and opinions can only be openly expressed if they concur with the party-line set by unelected leaders? A place where it is acceptable for members of parliament to march and campaign against the free press?

The Editor of the Sark Newspaper also invited Christopher Beaumont to his house for a cup of coffee over which he could outline his hopes, plans and visions for the Island’s future. This invitation was dismissed out of hand. The new feudal lord had no wish to associate himself with this publication.

I ndeed the entire exercise of clearing the decks for a new era under Christopher Beaumont’s leadership was as futile as the hope that Sark would finally be allowed to build the democracy and the economy it urgently needs in order for the Island to have a future at all.

On 15th July 2016 Sark’s unelected absentee feudal lord was interviewed by BBC Radio Guernsey and it turned out that his answer to all the questions we asked, was a resounding YES. Instead of addressing his people, who were eagerly waiting to learn more about their new unelected supreme leader - and instead of accepting the invitation from the Sark Newspaper - Christopher Beaumont chose the platform provided for him by the BBC to tell the people of Sark, as well as the world at large, that nothing would change.

Instead he expressed his disappointment with “criticism of the Island’s system of government” and declared himself to be “fully supportive of Sark’s government, Chief Pleas”. “There’s a perfectly good, working Chief Pleas and its gets my full support”, he told the BBC. Seigneur Christopher Beaumont had no intention whatsoever of putting his inherited powers and privileges to good use by promoting desperately needed reforms and changes, despite the fact that he thereby declared his “full support” for a government which is not elected by his Island’s people, does not represent his Island’s people and has, time and again over the past eight and a half years, proved that it has no intention of doing so in the future.

“I do view those that are critical of the system, in particular of my role, are just not acknowledging the truth”, Mr Beaumont ominously declared to the BBC, laying bare that he sees nothing wrong at all with a system under which he, an unelected private individual accountable to no one, inherited power and privileges unequalled by crowned heads and elected leaders across the free world in addition to substantial wealth and property.

The British Crown Dependency of Sark remains a totalitarian one-party state where criticism of the system - and in particular of the feudal lord’s role in it - is not tolerated under any circumstances and must be shown to be wrong and, indeed, unreasonable, with the help of Her Majesty’s representative is these Islands, the Lt. Governor, if need be.

The next time Sark’s unelected absentee feudal lord exposed himself to the media was in September 2016, when an incredulous Sark public was faced with large glossy photos of the newly minted Seigneur posing as ‘lord of the manor’ in front of the house which to this day remains occupied by Mr & Mr Synnott on the front page of Sark Life.

Busy with his life in the UK, the absentee feudal lord stayed out of the media limelight for a few months, not to feature again until he seized the opportunity provided by the Christmas Chief Pleas meeting on 18th January 2017 to spread lies, poison and propaganda about the newly closed down Sark Vineyards Ltd. Without availing himself to the facts, without once lifting up the phone and speaking to those involved, the uninformed and autocratic absentee feudal lord laid bare his adherence to the party-line set by his father. This he did by reading out a malicious statement no doubt prepared for him by his mentor and his father’s chief enforcer Reginald Guille. This statement derided the vineyards and its owners, condemning Sark’s only new industry in many decades and lying about the reason for the closure, namely the unelected sham parliament’s intention to introduce a unique-in the-world tax on the production of alcohol.

Then, in late April this year, the unelected absentee feudal lord once again regaled an unquestioning off-Island audience with his views on and visions for his Island, this time at an event organised by the Guernsey Chamber of Commerce. It goes without saying, without having the courtesy to address, much less consult, the people of his Island first.

This event was, as became glaringly obvious, part of a meticulously planned propaganda onslaught which was devised and carried out by Beaumont and the Lt. Governor, Sir Ian Corder, in concert. Partly facilitated through secret meetings over dinner at Government House where hand-picked unelected representatives from Sark colluded with hand-picked representatives from Guernsey commerce, politics and the Law Officers, Beaumont’s address just happened to coincide with Sir Ian undertaking a ‘fact finding trip’ to Sark. Both events just happened to generate extensive local media coverage, all of which was wildly inaccurate in its upbeat portrayal of present day Sark.

Here we are, in the middle of a new summer. Beaumont is still an absentee feudal lord, despite assuring us he’d be moving to Sark about now during that BBC Guernsey Radio interview last year. He still hasn’t had the decency to address, let alone engage with, the people of his Island publicly with regards to his views and plans for the future.

He doesn’t need to. Unelected and accountable to no one, the UK resident Christopher Beaumont holds totalitarian power over every aspect of life on this Island. He has made it absolutely clear that the only people he intends to address and engage with are those who conform with his views and do his bidding, be they in Government House, in St James Chambers or unelected members or state officials of his own sham parliament. Any person or body outside that sphere is treated with derision and contempt, their needs, wishes and aspirations to be discredited at any opportunity at any cost.

Unelected absentee feudal lord Christopher Beaumont is more than happy with his “fabulous legacy” of power, property and wealth, regardless of the fact that his Island is bankrupt, politically, economically and demographically. For 48 weeks he has contemptuously ignored this publication’s appeal on the behalf of the Island’s people to use his extensive power to reverse the decline of Sark and help his people build a future for themselves. Clearly he is indifferent to the harsh reality facing the many who don’t enjoy his and his unelected regime’s patronage. He couldn’t care less and has nothing but contempt for those suffering hardship and those who have no choice but to get on the infamous boat that leaves in the morning.

Unelected absentee feudal lord Christopher Beaumont possesses power, privilege and wealth courtesy of an inherited Crown Lease. Under that lease he also has duty of care with responsibility for the welfare of his people. Given his indifference and obvious contempt for that people, he is negligent of his duty and in breach of his lease. As an act of common decency he should therefore, as this publication has suggested before, hand it back to the Crown.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


8th June 2017

NO CONSTITUTIONAL POWERS
NO MANDATE


This sham ‘government’ does not represent the people of Sark.

SARK: THE ONLY SIGNATORY TO ECHR WITH AN UNELECTED ‘GOVERNMENT’ UNDER AN UNELECTED SUPREME LEADER

The European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) was ratified by the UK in 1951 and, two years later, it was extended to the Bailiwick of Guernsey, which became signatories to ECHR in 1953.

The Convention’s aim was to eliminate totalitarianism in Europe - to protect the people against atrocities and abuse of power by the state such as that carried out by Hitler’s Germany which again led to World War II.

In the year 2006, and after much procrastination, the ECHR was reluctantly incorporated in domestic civil law in Sark as well as in Guernsey, through the Bailiwick-wide Human Rights (Bailiwick of Guernsey) Law, 2000.

The then feudal lord Michael Beaumont was not best pleased about it and stated publicly on several occasions that this was the worst thing Sark ever did, which tells you all you need to know about the attitude of those who govern Sark, both then and now.

This Bailiwick legislation was, as laid out on the Guernsey government website, apparently introduced with the best of intentions:

“The broad aim in introducing the Law was to help create a society in which people’s rights and responsibilities are properly balanced and where an awareness of the Convention rights permeates our government and legal systems at all levels.”

“The Human Rights Law makes it unlawful for a public authority to act incompatibly with the Convention rights and allows for a case to be brought in a Bailiwick court or tribunal against the authority if it does so.”

“The Human Rights Law applies to all our legislation, policies and procedures.”


https://www.gov.gg/CHttpHandler.ashx?id=103811&p=0

Although the Beaumont family’s one-party regime voted it through, their intention never coincided with those of Guernsey. As ever - as with financial services regulations, as with international tax transparency and as with universal standards of good governance, to mention but a few, Sark’s totalitarian rulers signed the dotted line to get the outside world - Guernsey and the UK Ministry of Justice - off their backs and went on to ignore it. The Human Rights Law is not applied to the legislation, policies and procedures of the one-party state headed by unelected feudal lord Christopher Beaumont.

Not one member of Sark’s sham parliament, the Chief Pleas, is elected. Not one of its members has a mandate from the people of this Island, nor does feudal lord Christopher Beaumont, who dominates and controls the political decision-making process from his carved throne on a raised dais. The unelected feudal lord has powers over the constitution overriding that of the equally unelected body of the assembly.

Contrary to ECHR and in breach of the Human Rights Law, Beaumont and his unelected state officials continue to govern Sark in their own interest, not just ignoring the needs, wishes and interests of those they claim to represent, but in direct and open contravention of the needs, wishes and interests of the people as well as the legislation to which Sark is a signatory.

Instead of creating “a society in which people’s rights and responsibilities are properly balanced” in accordance with the ECHR and the Island’s own Human Rights Law, Sark’s feudal lords and their loyal one-party members have relentlessly created a society where they themselves are the only ones to have any rights; rights which the rapidly diminishing number of Sark taxpayers carry the responsibility to fund.

Whilst the unelected Christopher Beaumont and his totalitarian regime continue to introduce destructive legislation, policies and procedures which are devised solely to maintain their own positions of totalitarian power, status and privilege, Sark’s unelected rulers hand themselves state patronage, employ themselves in taxpayer-funded jobs, promote their private businesses through the state’s taxpayer-funded channels and operate lucrative but unregulated “offshore financial services” to line their own pockets. All whilst the Island is rapidly losing its young working population because of it.

The unelected individuals who hold absolute power in Sark never had any intention of applying the Human Rights Law on their Island and no one can make them do it. Simply because the self-legislating state of Sark is the only signatory to ECHR with an unelected ‘government’ under an unelected supreme leader accountable to no one - just the kind of lawless rogue state that the ECHR was designed to rein in.





1st of June 2017

BEAUTIFUL SARK

True beauty is not a concept limited to what you see with your eyes. Sark’s stunning views, picturesque bays and abundant wildflowers is not enough. To be a truly beautiful Island, Sark must also be a happy Island, reflecting the prosperity, freedoms and rights of the people who live and work here.

As the deeply flawed Reform Laws of 2008 and 2010 failed to introduce democracy and put an end to 450 years of feudal rule, the people of Sark must endure tyranny. Sark is Western Europe's only dictatorship; a self-legislating state where the people do not have a single democratically elected representative. They are under the control of an unelected feudal lord, his unelected state officials and his unelected one-party sham parliament.

Deprived of basic freedoms and rights and, certainly, any hope of prosperity, the people of Sark are governed by unelected individuals who are there for their own benefit and represent no one apart from themselves; an unelected mob who will support any system, even a failed one like Sark’s, to protect their own interests. The bond that holds feudal lord Christopher Beaumont’s sham ‘government’ and its supporters together is the lack of regulation which enables lucrative, unregulated “offshore financial services” to thrive and prosper, whilst the open economy lies in ruins.

Visually Sark is undoubtedly a beautiful Island but it is not a happy one. The destruction and divisions brought about by a one-party regime which, for over eight years, has relentlessly pursued a policy of economic ethnic cleansing that cannot easily be reversed, even if there were a will to do so. Stunning scenery and spectacular views cannot protect the people of Sark against the power of an unelected autocratic leader and the unelected members of his one-party state.

Today, Sark’s reputation as the jewel in the crown of the Channel Islands is overshadowed by its dysfunctional system of governance, fully deserving of comparison with fascist Germany of the 1930s, and the impact of Sark’s visual beauty is spoiled, eclipsed by the unhappiness and despair of the Island’s people.


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


25th May 2017

MEANINGLESS CHANGES TO THE REFORM LAW MAKE NO DIFFERENCE TO THE DIRE SITUATION SARK IS IN: MOVING THE DECKCHAIRS ON A SINKING SHIP

Due to the failed Reform Laws of 2008 and 2010, the British Crown Dependency of Sark is a failed state.

Sark is ungovernable because, under the totalitarian rule of the unelected feudal lord Christopher Beaumont, who is accountable to no one yet holds controlling power over the constitution, jurisdiction and judiciary, the Island has developed into a one-party state with more in common with Germany of the 1930s than any representative democracy on earth.

Sark is ungovernable because its ‘government’ consists of an unelected mob who represents no one except themselves and toes the party line as set by the feudal lord and his chosen leaders to secure for themselves the continued benefits of patronage, be they power, status or of a financial nature.

Sark is ungovernable because there is no rule of law. The law is enforced partly by the unelected members of the sham parliament and partly by hopelessly conflicted, short-term amateur constables answerable to the feudal lord and his unelected ‘government’. The law is upheld, supposedly, by an equally hopelessly conflicted judiciary, the members of which are, to a man, untrained and inexperienced in matters of law and appointed by the feudal lord himself and answerable to him for their positions and their income. Despite his lack of training and knowledge, principal judge Jeremy La Trobe-Bateman, feudal lord Christopher Beaumont’s uncle, nevertheless sits alone and has unlimited jurisdiction, including complicated child custody cases.

Sark is ungovernable because Sark’s wholly unelected regime, from the feudal lord himself down to the lowliest seat-filler in his sham parliament, ignore principles of democratic process, ignore principles of good governance, ignore expected standards in public life, ignore the needs and wishes of the people over whom they rule and ignore facts and dates and ignore common sense.

As a result, the Island of Sark is sinking; the economy is broken and the population is shrinking at an alarming rate with many of those remaining facing hardship. Crucially, the people who remain on the Island - there are barely 400 left from a population of 650 only eight years ago - have lost hope of things will improve the future.

The situation is critical. It is patently clear that Sark has no democracy or good governance. The Island’s economy is no longer sustainable, nor is its population. Nor, for that matter, is Sark’s unelected government, which is now unable to find enough recruits willing to fill its unelected seats. A failed state in all aspects, the Island is heading for oblivion - for ceasing to be an independent, self-governing jurisdiction.

Charles Maitland, the self-appointed ‘chief minister’ elected by no one and with a mandate from no one, is spear-heading the one ruling party regime’s solution to its own ungovernability - its own sinking.

This solution does not address the root cause of all that ails Sark, namely the feudal power structure which the Reform Laws failed to remove, thereby making democracy an impossibility. Nor does it introduce law and order or address the broken economy by announcing the urgently needed reversal of the destructive policies that broke it in the first place - as illustrated by the feudal lord’s 49 weeks of silence in response to our appeal opposite. Nor does the solution, soon no doubt to be labelled a “masterstroke” by its instigator, Charles Maitland, do anything to halt the steady stream of people, mostly young working couples and their children, who are leaving Sark for good to build a life for themselves elsewhere.

No, as always, Sark’s one ruling party is once again spending its time and scant resources on shoring up their own and their feudal lord’s unelected powers rather than acting for the common good in accordance with common sense. Pathetically, the unelected Maitland and his unelected colleagues in Christopher Beaumont’s regime are, with their feudal lord’s blessing, planning to avert the inevitable disaster by reducing the number of chairs in his sham parliament.

Much good it will do them. It is very much like rearranging the deckchairs for the orchestra playing on the sinking Titanic. Puppet maestro Maitland is frantically rearranging the seats for his discordant orchestra whilst the ship that is Sark silently sinks.


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


18th May 2017

ON A DIFFERENT PLANET

On Monday 24th April 2017, the Guernsey Press carried a two-page spread on Lt. Governor Sir Ian Corder’s ‘fact-finding’ tour on Sark, resplendent with colour photographs of his prowess on a bicycle and sprawling headlines proclaiming how business is thriving on Sark.

How can it be, Sir Ian, that the Island is booming when shops are closed and people leave, left right and centre? The fact is, of course that it isn’t true. The Lt. Governor’s visit and the corresponding media coverage was a carefully planned propaganda exercise by Sark’s unelected sham government, choreographed to coincide with feudal lord Christopher Beaumont’s revelation of his ‘vision’ for his Island at a Guernsey Chamber of Commerce event taking place of the same day.

By supporting this propaganda, both that presented in the Guernsey Press and that spouted by Beaumont to his unquestioning audience, all of which seeks to paint a picture of life on the Island of Sark based on lies, misinformation and wishful thinking, Sir Ian Corder declared his allegiance to the Beaumonts and their totalitarian regime. Unlike his predecessor, the late Air Marshal Sir Peter Walker, who refused to be awed or intimidated by Sark’s feudal lord and whose leadership was an inspiration and a great support for the people of Sark, Sir Ian appears to be taken in by the web of deceit presented to him.

Indeed, whilst addressing his deferential audience consisting of the lower echelons of Guernsey’s business community Beaumont as much as admitted that his talk was part of a propaganda onslaught by pointing out that, in support of his various lies and misleading statements, he had brought copies of the triumphant Guernsey Press coverage, which was “available here”.

The Sark Newspaper has already reported in detail on those lies and misleading statements; we have heard all these lies many times before over the last eight years.

The unelected feudal lord wants the world at large to believe his lie that “Sark is a democratic self-governing jurisdiction”. Self-governing, yes, but democratic? How can it be when the Island is led by an unelected hereditary feudal lord who presides over a ‘government’ which is a body of people none of whom have been elected, none of whom have a mandate from the Island’s citizens to govern on their behalf and none of whom represent anyone apart from themselves and their feudal lord - an unelected mob posing as a ‘government’?

The unelected feudal lord wants the world to believe his lie that he is “non-political” despite the fact that he presides over the political decision-making process from a raised dais, has the right to - and does - speak politically and persuade the assembly below him in any way he sees fit and put propositions before them which they are highly unlikely to oppose in view of the feudal lord’s extensive powers of patronage.

The feudal lord wants the world to believe his lie that the unelected ‘government’ of which he is the supreme but unelected leader “presents the lightest of touches” as far as the business community is concerned. In view of that government’s very public vendettas against the privately-owned Sark Electricity Ltd and Sark Vineyards Ltd, it beggars belief that no one in an audience consisting of business people protested.

The unelected feudal lord wants the world to believe the lie that Sark’s public finances are in enviably good order when the fact is that the balance sheet relies on worthless shares in a near-insolvent shipping company and unsaleable assets whilst the meagre budget is balanced by failure to maintain the crumbling infrastructure, failure to educate the children adequately, failure to support the sick and the elderly and failure to invest in the future. All whilst Sark depends on an annual subsidy from Guernsey’s taxpayers of some £2 million a year - twice the Island’s official budget - to function.

What we have also heard before, both from the current feudal lord and from his equally uncaring late father Michael Beaumont, is the Island of Sark portrayed as a utopia - somewhere “most view as a complete idyll”. Anyone from off-Island will be forgiven for falling for this falsehood, but it doesn’t wash with what remains of the local population. Natural beauty, certainly, is abundant, but that is as far as the idyll goes. A casual day-tripper will be blissfully unaware that Sark Islanders are deprived of democracy and subjected to the totalitarian rule of an unelected feudal lord and his unelected ‘government’. An unsuspecting tourist guided to the rose bushes at La Seigneurie Gardens will not be made aware that the people of this Island have no statutory right to social security, welfare or health-care of any kind if they are elderly, become ill or fall on hard times. A cruise ship passenger sitting down for a cup of tea is not likely to dwell on the fact that Sark’s children do not get GCSE-level education unless their parents are able to pay the cost.

What we have never publicly heard before, however, is Sark’s feudal lord belittling the people who suffer because of his self-serving and uncaring rule. In patronising tones the highly-privileged Christopher Beaumont, who recently inherited substantial wealth, highlighted how many Islanders manage “up to seven-part time jobs... seamlessly” as if such a life were desirable and indeed unavoidable. It is neither desirable - seven part-time jobs signifies financial hardship and a total lack of job security - nor is it unavoidable. If Beaumont permitted his Island to develop an economy that sustains the working population, his people would not have to scramble around to find work six hours a week mowing lawns and cleaning windows for seven different employers to be able to, if they are lucky, pay the rent and feed their children. Christopher Beaumont is not just detached from reality, he is on a different planet from the rest of us - and so is the Lt. Governor who fails the people of Sark by lending credibility to their untrustworthy feudal lord.


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


11th May 2017

WHY WE NEED AN APPLICATION TO THE
EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS


People get the government they are prepared to accept. Therefore - because the people of Sark accept it - their Island is governed by an unelected body of people whose governance can only be described as mob rule.

No one in the outside world is willing to rescue Sark. By openly acknowledging and paying homage to our unelected feudal lord and his unelected sham ‘government’, the outside authorities with a responsibility for and interest in the good governance of Sark - the Crown, the UK Ministry of Justice and the democratically elected government of Guernsey - have made it patently clear that they will not lift a finger to hold Sark’s unelected rulers to account or help implement the democracy which the people of Sark were promised over eight long years ago. It is far more convenient for them to smooth things over and keep up the pretence - the utter falsehood - that Sark is a democracy and nothing is wrong in spite of the overwhelming and glaringly obvious evidence to the contrary.

That does not, however, mean that we, the people of Sark, have to accept being governed by an unelected one-party regime led by an unelected and autocratic hereditary feudal lord and his chosen and equally unelected enforcers. Continuing to do nothing whilst Sark dies under the yoke of tyranny is no longer an option. We must help ourselves.

In Germany of the 1930s tyranny became a way of life because it was too late to oppose or stop the brutal and ruthless fascist regime. It was the rise to power of that regime which created World War II. Despite its clear parallels with fascist Germany of the 1930s, it is not too late to stop the tyranny of Sark’s unelected totalitarian regime under an unelected feudal lord.

There are three ways of making our non-acceptance of the status quo absolutely clear, both to the leaders and members of Sark’s totalitarian regime and to the world at large: by protesting openly and publicly, by refusing to pay the taxes raised by unelected state officials with no mandate from the people to do so and, crucially, by appealing to the European Court of Human Rights.

The European Convention on Human Rights - ECHR - came into being during the aftermath of World War II. Originally drafted mainly by the UK government, it is an important part of international law which is there to protect the individual against abuse of power by the state.

The governance of the British Crown Dependency of Sark is hallmarked by its breaches of ECHR; its people are deprived of their right to self-determination, deprived of their right to justice and law and order and deprived of their right to build a future for themselves. In the western world, today there is no greater example than Sark to illustrate why the ECHR came into being and became law across Europe; there is no greater example of tyranny. A one-party state under an unelected and autocratic leader has forced through a policy of wanton economic destruction and wilfully brought about the mass depopulation of an already sparsely population Island in a process akin to economic ethnic cleansing of which any European fascist state of the 1930s would have been proud.

Over 35% of Sark’s population has left, mainly young working families and their children. In the absence of an economy to sustain the working people with jobs and an income, Sark’s population has shrunk from 650 eight years ago to under 410 year-round residents today.

The root cause of this unacceptable situation is the unelected powers, rights and privileges of one unelected individual accountable to no one, supreme autocratic leader and hereditary feudal lord Christopher Beaumont. He holds unelected powers which, in breach of ECHR, enable the ceaseless abuse of power by an unelected totalitarian state fully deserving of comparison with fascist Germany of the 1930s.

The past eight years have shown that passive resistance to this mob rule doesn’t work. Indeed, passive resistance has proved to be no resistance at all with appeals to the Lt. Governor and the Ministry of Justice leading nowhere, resulting only in fruitless rounds of empty talk and hollow promises off the record. All whilst the wilful and malicious economic, demographic and social destruction wreaked by the self-serving Beaumont family’s self-serving one-party regime has been permitted to go on unabated.

The British Crown Dependency of Sark is now at a tipping point where it is becoming unsustainable in all aspects. The need for change is urgent if this Island is to have a future.

The only solution is for the people of this Island to make their opposition seen and heard; to publicly and openly oppose the tyranny of the unelected and unaccountable feudal lord. To publicly and openly defy the tyranny of the unelected and unaccountable members of his one-party mob who make laws, administer laws and raise taxes without a mandate from the people, last but not least, the people of Sark must make an application to the European Court of Human Rights and have the unelected power that destroys Sark challenged and adjudicated in an international and independent Court of Law.

If we, the people of Sark, are not prepared to stand up for our basic human rights and oppose the unelected and autocratic Christopher Beaumont and his sham parliament, then we must face the inevitable consequences, permanent unemployment, further depopulation, continued despair and no hope of a future.


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


4th May 2017

IF WE GET THE GOVERNMENTS WE DESERVE, WHAT HAVE THE PEOPLE OF SARK DONE TO DESERVE THIS?

We get the governments we deserve, the saying goes. It isn’t true for the British Crown Dependency of Sark.

The people of Sark are stuck with an unelected and autocratic hereditary feudal lord who cannot be voted out of office but, nevertheless, dominates the political decision-making process because he owns and controls the constitution, jurisdiction and judiciary of the Island.

The people of Sark, who haven’t seen a ballot box for four years, are stuck with a sham parliament that is entirely unelected since not one of its members has received a single vote. A sham parliament which has no authority in the absence of mandate from the people to govern on their behalf.

The people of Sark are stuck with a one-party state, the leaders, officials and members of which rule over their lives without considering anyone’s needs and interests apart from their own and without adhering to the most basic standards of good governance.

The people of Sark are disenfranchised; they have no one representing them, they have no one safeguarding their interests and they are utterly powerless to do anything about it.

Uniquely in the civilized world, the people of Sark have, for the past eight years, been subjected to a relentless campaign of state-sponsored economic destruction undertaken by their own government. Intentional economic destruction carried out with open eyes by those in power, regardless of the unemployment, hardship and suffering it caused amongst the working population. State-sponsored economic destruction which has led to an unprecedented and on-going depopulation of Sark akin to the economic ethnic cleansing of Germany during the 1930s.

How about protests, you may wonder? Only members and supporters of the one-party state can march in confidence. They have no fear of retribution from the all-powerful one-party state and its unelected leaders and members. For them, marching against lawful activities, be it agricultural projects or the free press holding them to account in the public interest, provides them with a badge of honour. A way to prove their loyalty to Christopher Beaumont’s one ruling party state and secure the corresponding rewards of patronage.

Only in a democracy do the people deserve the government they get. The people of Sark have done nothing to deserve a totalitarian one-party government under an autocratic hereditary feudal lord, none of whom have been voted into office.

The only thing the people of Sark have done wrong, their only mistake, was to believe that the Reform Law of 2008 would deliver democracy to the Island. That mistake was also made by the UK’s Ministry of Justice and the Crown, but it is the people of Sark alone who are suffering the dire consequences.


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------